Economic opportunity is a moral issue

In every election year we're barraged with rhetoric about "getting the country moving again," "creating jobs, jobs, jobs," and "stimulating the economy." Politicians love to promise the future and ignore their own handiwork of the past. They typically spend much more time concocting new schemes for intervention than they spend searching for old ones that deserve to be repealed. What really deserves our attention are those barriers to economic opportunity erected by government -- regulations, taxes, licensure laws, unfunded mandates, special privileges for organized labor, subsidies to business, eminent domain abuse, chronic budget deficits that consume needed capital, and an education monopoly that fails to teach children as it vacuums their parents' wallets, to name a few. Studies show that excessively restrictive zoning laws, building codes, and property taxes constitute the greatest obstacles to affordable housing for the poor. Minimum wage laws, by making it illegal to employ people whose skills are worth less than government decrees, keep hundreds of thousands from getting a start in the job market. Endless regulations designed to curtail entry into markets (often in the guise of "protecting the public") freeze out many a would-be entrepreneur from creating new businesses.
I'm talking about the primary social disease of our age -- government beyond its proper bounds, playing Robin Hood, Santa Claus, and Mother Hen all at the same time, inflicting real damage to real people who have victimized no one. What is sorely needed is a recognition of the moral backwardness that so many of these barriers to economic opportunity represent. We must appeal to what most people instinctively know is right, not just what makes the cash register sing. We must learn to speak of the deleterious actions of government in terms of trampled rights, broken dreams and ruined lives. Sky-high tax burdens in the inner city should be viewed as an affront to every citizen who wants the best for his family, who wants simply a chance to be productive. They should evoke visions of hungry children, of a boarded-up business that was once someone's dream, of homes torn apart because of the breadwinner's inability to pay the bills of irresponsible politicians. Why are people who work for government known as "public servants" -- even when highly paid? Why isn't "public servant" a term reserved for entrepreneurial heroes in the private sector who create jobs, invent machines, cure illnesses, build businesses, serve customers, and pay the bills of government with their taxes? The campaign to enhance our economic opportunities must incorporate a personal, moral dimension at its core. Laws which suffocate enterprising aspirations are more than bad economics. In a free society, they ought to be a moral outrage. ••• (Lawrence W. Reed, a resident of Newnan, is president of the Foundation for Economic Education in Irvington, N.Y., and Atlanta.)


More Opinion

A note from the publisher

A lot has occurred at The Newnan Times-Herald over the last few months, and I believe it’s an appropriate time to let you know what we ... Read More


Rants, Raves & Really?!?

A look back at last week’s highs, lows and whatevers: REALLY?!?: Grantville has a new police chief, the third one in about as many yea ... Read More


Georgia Says

The Augusta (Georgia) Chronicle on the Affordable Care Act: A private foundation issued a report claiming 20 million Americans "gained cover ... Read More


‘Murder in Coweta’ has continual silver lining

The killing of farmhand William Turner in 1948 was a tragedy. Turner, who was using the name Wilson Turner, was a young husband and father. ... Read More


Rants, Raves & Really?!?

RAVE: To Alex Ogletree for giving back to his alma mater, Newnan High. Ogletree gave $5,000 to upgrade the NHS weight room. The NFL gave a m ... Read More

Georgia Says

Savannah Morning News on healthy use for food stamps: The nation's welfare system often does a better job of keeping some families in povert ... Read More