Savannah (Ga.) Morning News on anti-smoking movement moves outside:
The new crusade against outdoor smoking seems driven more by puritanism than concern for public health.
That is, at least until there's much stronger evidence that banning lighting up outside isn't a cure for which there's no proven malady.
In recent years, regulations have mandated servings of cold turkey for puffers in bars, restaurants, campuses and workplaces across the country.
And with good reason.
There's a mountain of data that shows that second-hand smoke is dangerous when ingested in confined indoor spaces.
It's well-documented that inhaling someone else's burnt tobacco leftovers increases the risks of cancer, emphysema, heart disease and stroke, to name a few.
Such inhalation is also noxious — if not health-threatening — to people with asthma, bronchitis or other respiratory problems.
In short, the health impacts of second-hand exposure can be only slightly less severe to other people in confined spaces as they are to smokers themselves.
The relevant principle is clear. Once again, the strongest link involves second-hand smoke and semi-enclosed outdoor cafés. And the most vulnerable people are those who have no choice but to remain there for long periods — the staff — as well as people with respiratory issues. So smoking bans in those settings might be reasonable.
Aside from such situations, Columbia University professor Ronald Bayer recently told the Associated Press, "The evidence of risk to people in open-air settings is flimsy."
The Marietta (Ga.) Daily Journal on Obamacare:
The federal government is running out of money again, and Congress needs to pass legislation to fund fiscal 2014, which starts Oct. 1. Thus, Congress and the president will soon be debating whether to raise the limit on the nation's credit card.
Conservative Republicans see the coming debt limit and federal funding debate as an opportunity to pull the financial rug out from under Obamacare.
Led by Utah Sen. Mike Lee, they say they're prepared to shut the government down rather than authorize any money to implement the health care reform law.
Pressure mounted this week, when more than 50 conservative organizations and luminaries wrote a letter to House Republicans urging them to use the government spending bill to defund Obamacare. We appreciate the spirit of the argument. Obamacare is opposed by a majority of Americans: Support for it is in the 30th percentile and opposition to it is in the 50th percentile in most polls.
And that doesn't begin to explain the growing unpopularity of Obamacare. Perhaps this does: A week after three major labor unions warned of the destruction of the middle class by Obamacare, the National Treasury Employees Union asked its members to write their elected representatives in Congress to oppose their being included in Obamacare health-care exchanges.
The union's membership might interest you: It includes employees at the IRS, the very agency charged with enforcing the law!
That's when you know you're losing the crowd.
But despite all this, we're not sure Obamacare is sufficiently unpopular that Republicans will look like heroes to much of the public by blocking it — particularly if they have to shut down a good bit of the federal government to get that done.
The last big government shutdown, in the 1990s, was a public relations disaster for congressional Republicans. There's no reason to think it wouldn't be this time, either. Consider: The main result of the GOP blockade of Obamacare would be to deny many folks of its benefits, including subsidies that begin Jan. 1, to millions of voting-age Americans.
The former mainstream media would no doubt savage Republicans for doing so, and for shutting down non-essential portions of the government.
The principal effect might be to make Obamacare more popular than it deserves to be, and to ensure Democratic control of the Senate in next year's midterm elections. It might even endanger Republicans' hold on the House, too, according to Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), perhaps the party's leading fiscal hawk.
It may be a form of assisted suicide, but Republicans had their chance to win over voters in last year's elections and failed. All that may remain for the electorate to take its bitter medicine — and for conservatives to pick up the pieces later, if there are any.