Water Authority should rethink proposed leak increase fee

We are fortunate in Coweta County to have so many private citizens step up to serve on countless governmental boards — whether as volunteers or in appointed positions.

They take time from their businesses and jobs to serve their fellow citizens — from city council and county commission to libraries, airports and development boards. So it is rare when we come out and disagree with a proposed plan, knowing the volunteer body in question is doing what it believes is in the best interest of all.

Such is the case with the Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority, which is proposing a significant hike in its leak policy. Currently, when major leaks occur, the authority calculates the leaked usage and only charges the customer the wholesale rate for that water.

As of now, that rate is $2.86 per 1,000 gallons. The proposal would jump that rate to $5.19 per 1,000 gallons.

That’s not a small increase — it’s a near doubling of the current rate. And we don’t agree.

Authority members themselves in a recent news article talked about lightning strikes causing major leaks. Other obvious examples include residents leaving town on vacation and returning to find water all over their yard from a leak caused by who knows what.

A near doubling of the leak rate when it is no fault of the customer just isn’t right. The leak adjustments currently account for about 1.1 percent of total annual water revenue — a proverbial drop in the bucket for the authority. But it’s a major geyser for customers who would get hit with the new rate.

Authority Chairman Neal Shepard, in discussing the rate hike, said, “I think we all know that … 98 percent of our customers are not going to work the system.” We say, therefore, those 98 percent shouldn’t face such a massive increase. We think it’s pretty easy to tell when a “leak” somehow fills someone’s new swimming pool or waters a two-acre garden.

The authority has undertaken massive improvements to the county’s water system with major upgrades and expansions, as well as the installation of new radio meters. More importantly, two other major changes need to be mentioned.

First, the authority has reduced its “unaccounted for,” or lost water, from a staggering 48 percent a few years ago to 11 percent now. Second, Standard & Poor’s recently upgraded the authority’s credit rating, saying, “In our opinion, the authority’s financial profile is solid.”

The staff and appointed board members of the authority should be commended for those efforts. And we do so.

But here’s the “but”: A near doubling of the leak policy isn’t fair to the overwhelming majority who follow the rules and are suddenly hit with a major water bill through no fault of their own. We encourage the authority to reconsider and keep the current rates.



More Opinion

Foley beheading is ‘growing up’ moment for social media

The beheading of American journalist James Foley – and the distribution of images showing that crime – have led to a moment of m ... Read More


Who is the real victim?

We will soon see a new phrase added to the urban dictionary – “looting tourism.” Over the last several days, Americans hav ... Read More


Rants, Raves & Really?!?

A look back at last week’s highs, lows and whatevers: RANT: Two people were killed in a single-engine plane crash near the Coweta and ... Read More


Georgia Says

The Augusta (Georgia) Chronicle on stronger borders: If America's border security is so weak to be breached by thousands of unaccompanied C ... Read More


Helping the homeless

Living in a big city, one of the more uncomfortable aspects of walking down a sidewalk is seeing the homeless begging for money. Many are po ... Read More

Uncovering the whole story

– The video working its way through social media, and also posted on our website at times-herald.com, clearly shows Newnan Police Depa ... Read More