Do you think the City of Newnan should have waited until at least mid-month to begin hanging its Christmas decorations in downtown rather than the first week in November?
Total Votes:
Published Saturday, March 14, 2009 in Local
The Times-Herald
Georgia's teenage drivers would be forbidden from using cell phones while driving, except in an emergency, under a bill that passed the Georgia House Thursday.
House Bill 23 prohibits the use of cell phones and similar electronic devices by Class D drivers under the age of 18. A violation would be punished by a fine of $50 to $100 and two points on the offender's driving record.
Teens who cause accidents while using a phone in violation of the law would automatically lose their licenses for 90 days or until their 18th birthday, whichever is sooner.
There are exceptions for emergency situations.
The bill passed 138-34 on "crossover day."
Thursday was the 30th legislative day. If a bill doesn't make it through either the House or Senate by crossover day, it typically dies, though bills can be resurrected as amendments.
Coweta's House members were split on the bill.
Rep. Lynn Smith, R-Newnan, voted in favor. Smith "lived through that first huge debate years ago when we created the Class D license and made it stricter -- and it has worked," she said. Because teens are so inexperienced, she felt like the new rule was the right thing to do.
Rep. Billy Horne, R-Sharpsburg, voted against the bill.
"I thought the state was spreading it on a little too thick on that one," he said. He felt the automatic license suspension was a bit harsh, and that the punishment should fit the crime, not paint everyone with the same broad brush.
Horne said he is very concerned about teens, and adults, texting while driving, but "I don't know that we as a legislature can pass a good law that would actually solve that problem without just totally overreaching in some cases."
The texting bill was just one of 70 that hit the House floor on Thursday. The session began at 9 a.m. and ended just before 11 p.m.
"I'm worn out. It is going to take me a week to recover from this week," Horne said.
For Horne, the most important bills to pass were House Bills 481 and 482, the business success act bills. HB 481 gives employers a credit against their unemployment tax for hiring people who are currently receiving unemployment, and gives an income tax credit for every new hire who stays on at least two years. The bill also waives business start-up fees and waives the requirement for dealers to remit estimated sales tax liability.
HB 482 calls for a state-wide referendum to consider eliminating the state ad valorem tax on business inventory.
"In a time like this, we have got to do one thing, and that is get people back to work," Horne said. "We think that these pieces of legislation are going to do more toward doing that than any so-called stimulus coming down from Washington."
Another bill provides an income tax credit for purchasing a home.
Smith, as chairwoman of the House Natural Resources and Environment Committee, was pushing a few natural resources bills.
House Bill 158 requires that new multi-family residential buildings must provide for measurement, and separate billing, of water usage for each unit.
The bill has been in the works for several years.
"It took years of push forward, push back," Smith said. "Finally, a compromise was reached." There are many options to allow compliance with the bill.
Smith is also excited about a "voluntary remediation" bill that makes it simpler for property owners to rehabilitate land that is contaminated.
Typically, all property must be remediated to "drinking water standards," Smith said. That process is difficult and costly and not necessary for a site that has been, and will continue to be, an industrial site.
The Georgia Environmental Protection Division "worked out with all the stakeholders what levels would be acceptable remediation of those properties that weren't at the drinking water standard," Smith said.
Smith is also proud of House Resolution 338, which states that Georgia's development of its land and offshore energy resources will be done in a balanced manner, promoting energy independence while respecting the natural environment and protecting it for future generations, Smith said.
Times-Herald.com does not necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Responsibility of comments rests solely with the writer. Comments posted in ALL CAPS will be deleted.
Submission of a comment does not guarantee publication. Comments will be posted by a moderator after being scanned for abusive language, relevance, etc. See our Comments FAQ for more details.
Do you hold the bratty children to your ear and drive one handed? Use your common sense.
Posted by tom at 2:51 PM
Laws are enacted when the public proves it can't control itself. This is not the case of the few affecting the many. Just look around at your next stop light and count the people talking on cell phones. It is easily 1 out of 5 or 20% for those without math skills. That is a very very conservative estimate. Imagine if the unemployment rate was 20%! There would be pandemonium!
Posted by By the way at 2:45 PM
Don't stop at cells. How about ticket conversations in cars, stereos, bratty children screaming in backseats, having any passengers that may be distracting such as wives in labor, lighting cigarettes, opening gum wrappers, eating fast food, drinking delicious beverages, sneezing, etc. I guess its human nature to be complete and total control freaks. Life happens, make your own wise choices with your own teenagers. Perhaps, parents should be responsible and either don't buy these cells or only allow them to work in emergencies.
Posted by Katie B. at 11:00 AM
I agree 1000% with this law but it will be impossible to enforce. Do you want your local police pulling over drivers with cell phones or responding to real emergencies. The reality of the situation is that cut backs in department spending means less police on the street. Cell phone companies should be pressured to solve this problem just like the tobacco companies have to spend millions on anti smoking campaigns! They caused the problem they should find a solution. Another solution is GET OFF THE DANG PHONE!!
Posted by By the way at 10:12 AM
Gov't will never make cell phone usage illegal while driving because guess who donates money to the candidates during election season ? AT&T Verizon, T Mobile, etc
Posted by Mark at 9:35 AM
Kim, I hope you are not superstitious. I made a bold statement similar to your around xmas time and my daughter totaled her car 2 days later. Careful what you brag about.
Posted by Mark at 9:30 AM
All right the person using Adams name on here without his permisson is in trouble. lol
Posted by tom q at 9:22 AM
Im actually with ya on this one Tommy.
Posted by Adam Reuter at 6:40 AM
this is crazy ! we must stop car drivers using there cell phones while driving.. we must take a leaf out of the UK goverments book, they have introduced tough laws regarding cell phones and driving .. if your caught on a cell while driving tyou recive a $120 fine and 3 points on your licence.. if you get 12 points in 3 years with driving offences you get banned from driving for 1 year and your insurance policy is loaded.... come on US lets save lives now !
Posted by Ron Jones at 4:43 AM
When is someone going to do something about the senior citizens? They need to have a drivers test every year. Just today I saw a senior woman driving the wrong way on Bullsboro!!!
Posted by Kyle at 8:31 PM
In regard to "Kim- this is crazy". My daughters BEST friend was killed in a head on crash in November. Both of the cars were doing the speed limit, no other passengers, no drugs or alcohol involved. Both drivers died on impact...the other driver was 19 and texting. Enough said~Glad your 5 out of 6 are safe,ALWAYS look out for the other guy.
Posted by JoAnn at 6:14 PM
Driving and talking on a cellphone increases the risk of a rear-end collision. Drivers are more likely to be in a collision while attempting to turn left and also to run red lights. A driver using a cellphone also takes much more time to react to the unexpected, like a child darting into the street.Using a cellphone while driving can be compared to driving after having several alcoholic drinks. Whether the driver is young or old, cellphone use carries the same risks. It is more difficult to pay attention to and react to everything on the road.Is there a difference between conversing with a passenger and talking on a cellphone? Any conversation can be distracting. However, passengers naturally adjust the conversation according to traffic flow, weather and the complexity of the motoring environment. The person at the other end of a cellphone call cannot do so. It is the cellphone conversation that is the distraction and the danger.
Posted by Ammaw aka Kim Ashmore at 5:19 PM
Why just teenagers. Everyone should be banned from using a cell phone while driving! Other states have enacted such laws. Georgia is way behind......again!
Posted by BigDee at 2:49 PM
Do you hold the cd player againist your ear and drive with one hand? Use a little common sense.
Posted by tom Q at 2:42 PM
They have laws that address cell phone use while driving. Police often write tickets for failure to maintain lane. If cops see ya weaving down the road you will get a ticket. Cause an accident and people say you were on the phone and you will get a ticket.I abhor people who dive while on the phone. I saw an elderly person nearly get ran down at publix.
Posted by c at 12:14 PM
Considering there are many more "grown-up" drivers out there using their cell phones in far more dangerous situations, such as rush hour on the interstates, than teenagers, this bill needs to include adults. Seriously - whatever you need to talk about can wait until you get to work or home. "Hang up the phone, ya big dope!"
Posted by S at 10:19 AM
Anything that distracts the driver should be illegal. Hands free should be banned as well. HB482 should include privately owned vehicles as well not just business owned.
Posted by Dyark at 10:05 AM
And why not pass a bill against CD players or anything else that would distract us...you can not change your radio, you can not smoke(15 yrs ago they said most accidents were caused by people lighting a cigarette),no kids in the car(fussing kids are a HUGE distraction). The list can go on and on. I did'nt need legislation to tell me how to be safe when I drove at 16(That was my PARENT'S JOB) and I don't need it to do it now! 47 year old mother of 6 with 5 driving and NO accidents.
Posted by Kim at 9:59 AM
I like the bill, but I would like it to expand to all drivers. Remember driving is not a right, but a privlidge. Hopefully, we can also change the driving age to 18 finally. Probably the soccer moms would oppose this.
Posted by Joe Schmoe at 9:45 AM
this law needs to be for all driver not just for teens this need be for hand free ear pices too !!!!
Posted by mike l p at 9:38 AM
Why pick on teenagers? Adults are doing the same thing.
Posted by cowboy at 8:28 AM
Why limit the scope of this bill to teenage drivers only? While they are certainly less experienced behind the wheel their elders are just as prone to distraction brought about by attempting to multi-task while driving. Rewrite the bill to make it include drivers of all ages. Hang Up and Drive!
Posted by downtowner at 4:30 AM
this is good
3/16/2009
Link To This Comment
This is really good and we should really stop the cell phone or should i say 'Texting' While driving. It will start to cause a lot of deaths just because of a simple "Hi" or "What's up?" To their friend.
Posted by Mckinzie H at 10:00 PM