The Times-Herald View Today's Print Edition

Opinion

Quick Poll

With the recent passing of music icons Donna Summer and Robin Gibb – each had major success in the 1970s and 1980s – which music decade is your favorite?

View Results

  • Pre-1960s: 45
  • 1960s: 83
  • 1970s: 144
  • 1980s: 119
  • 1990s: 30
  • 2000s: 2
  • Present: 13

Total Votes:

Recent Polls

Blogs

Angela McRae

Tea with friends

Deberah Williams

Everyday Finesse

Lorrie Lynch

Who's News

USA Weekend Tween Tribune - News For Tweens
Click Here

Published Saturday, February 04, 2012 in Opinion

Readers' comments on effectiveness of state agencies

Editorial

Editor's note: Here is a sampling of readers' comments about our Wednesday editorial: "We like the idea of reviewing effectiveness of state agencies." This editorial pertained to Senate Bill 223, which, if approved, would give state agencies an expiration date unless they are renewed by legislation. The comments were posted on times-herald.com.

-- The ongoing review of state agencies and their budgets is good and necessary. However, passage of this bill is nothing more than a "see-what-I've-done" bill that some will point to in their re-election campaigns later this year. If passed by the House and eventually signed by the governor, I doubt it will have any significant impact on governmental operations. Are there some agencies that could go? No doubt there is, but most agencies of any import are created to deal with specific ongoing needs or handle obligations mandated by the federal government.

-- It sounds good in theory, but it's just another level of government that won't have much power or authority and will likely be made up of people who have no idea what each agency actually does.

-- It's about time that we start looking at the size of all government agencies and begin phasing them out. Well done.

-- It would be beneficial to have equal numbers of ordinary citizens on the panel, if this legislation is passed. Legislators often have bias due to the very office they hold because they regularly interact with government agencies.

-- Glad that bureaucracy can be reduced, thus improving efficiency. Corporations do this all the time because they have competition. Government has no competition. The states with inefficient agencies become less desirable for new business and residents while having higher taxes and cost of living. Let us hope that our elected officials will do what they say.

Comment On This Story

Times-Herald.com does not necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Responsibility of comments rests solely with the writer. Comments posted in ALL CAPS will be deleted.

Submission of a comment does not guarantee publication. Comments will be posted by a moderator after being scanned for abusive language, relevance, etc. See our Comments FAQ for more details.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented

© 2011 The Newnan Times-Herald Inc., Newnan, Georgia. Any unauthorized use, copying or mirroring is prohibited.