Another view on social programs

This is in response to a opinion piece titled “Social programs not socialism.”
The writer may want to look up the terms in the dictionary before he tells others to do so. The definition of socialism is any various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. Social programs are welfare subsidies designed to aid the needs of the U.S. population. Both of these definitions came out of the dictionary.
The post office and NASA are government owned. And both operate in the red, costing taxpayers billions to operate. I do not advocate closing down either one, but they could be run better by the private sector.
Has the government really run anything efficiently? Amtrak is another government -run business that is in the red. The government still owns part of GM. They don’t seem to be doing very well, and taxpayers have lost money on that venture.
Social programs are things like welfare, food stamps and social security.
Tom Quattlebaum, Newnan

More Opinion

Where’s the ice?

Let’s call it the storm that wasn’t. Predictions of 1-3 inches of snow, freezing rain leading to the dreaded black ice and a who ... Read More


Why conservatives get mad at the mainstream media

It is an ongoing feature in modern-American politics that rears its head every day and consistently draws the ire of Conservatives. Look no ... Read More


Rants, Raves & Really?!?

A look back at last week’s highs, lows and whatevers: REALLY?!? Javier Garcia, who “resigned” as Grantville’s police ... Read More


Georgia Says

The Gainesville Times on Gov. Deal's plan for schools: For decades, conservative leaders in Washington and Atlanta have preached the goal o ... Read More


Coweta’s economic situation continues on right path

A lot of times it seems economic gurus use a litany of crystal balls, chicken feet, dice rolls and sometimes even monkeys to figure out what ... Read More

Had enough yet?

We have suggested more than once that Grantville needs to revoke its city charter and just give up. Obviously, our suggestion has fallen on ... Read More