With the recent passing of music icons Donna Summer and Robin Gibb – each had major success in the 1970s and 1980s – which music decade is your favorite?
Total Votes:
Published Saturday, February 04, 2012 in Local
The Newnan Times-Herald
This year's committee dinner for the state House Natural Resources and Environment Committee has become controversial.
The dinner was held Jan. 25, and it was the subject of a news story in a major Atlanta newspaper that kicked off a series of stories on lobbying and potential ethics reform.
Much of the scrutiny in the article was directed on the committee's chairman, State Rep. Lynn Smith, R-Newnan.
Attending the dinner were approximately 20 members of Smith's committee, as well as 10 lobbyist "sponsors" who enjoyed dinner with the legislators and picked up the check, with two lobbyists paying slightly more than the rest -- the Georgia Conservancy and the Georgia Farm Bureau Federation.
"The premise [of the news story] was that a legislator can be influenced by a meal, and that is just not true," Smith said.
"I've always made my decisions as a legislator and an individual on the merits of the issue," she said. "As a legislator, it's the merits of the issue, the points of view that I can gather from the constituents in my district," as well as technical information.
"Sometimes, yes, you talk to lobbyists to get an idea," Smith said.
"You can talk to two of them and get two totally different ideas," she said. "It's just a process of putting information together. I talk to agency heads. I'm all over our district all the time, trying to give information on the district I represent.
"Lobbyists have no influence on me," she added.
There is a wide variety of lobbyists at the Georgia capitol, and not all lobbyists are what one might expect. State agencies have lobbyists, city and county organizations -- and just about every other type of organization and association -- have lobbyists. Then there are the business lobbyists, many of whom work directly for the company they lobby for, and others who work for lobbying firms that contract their services.
"Just about any issue you can think of has a lobbyist," Smith said. "I do my homework, and my homework doesn't include listening to just one person."
If a lobbyist is giving legislators information that isn't trustworthy, they quickly find out.
"What is the most important thing that a legislator or a lobbyist or a citizen has? ... The most important thing is that person's word and speaking the truth. Because it is going to come out anyway," Smith said. "If you have a legislator who is going to do their homework like I am -- I am going to ask around and find out. If I find someone has not leveled with me, that is when they don't have access to me."
"Most of your legislators up there do their homework, and a lobbyist loses street cred if they don't tell the truth," Smith said. Likewise, "a legislator loses street cred with their fellow legislators if they don't tell the truth."
Most, if not all, House and Senate committees have a committee dinner each year.
"It gets your Democrats and Republicans together who are on your committee and it gives you a social setting to do it," Smith said. "When you're on the House floor and in the chamber and in your committees, people usually are positioned certain ways and such... and if it is always acrimony, then you don't solve issues."
According to Smith, once they had picked a date for the dinner, they asked for sponsors.
"I said, when you ask for sponsors make sure you get a broad spectrum," Smith said.
But couldn't the committee members get together for dinner and pay for it themselves, without lobbyist sponsors?
"Can we do it on our own? Yeah, we can still gather," Smith said.
There was no set fee in order to be a sponsor or anything like that, Smith said. Instead, everybody ate and then the sponsors decided how to divide the costs. Smith said whenever such an event is put together, "I always say -- keep this at a moderate, reasonable cost."
Smith was asked what the conversation was like at the committee dinner.
"It is just more causal conversation," Smith said. "The people I was around were talking about their children, my grandchildren. I make it very clear -- you're not supposed to talk shop, period. A dinner doesn't equate to the right to tell this legislator this about an issue. That is just not what is supposed to take place. It really is social."
"Maybe that is where the wrong impression comes in," she said.
"Now what does a lobbyist see that they get in return ... I can't speak for any lobbyists," Smith said. But "I think to a certain extent, it is cultivating relationships."
"It's just like a job in sales. You try and build relationships. You need to be honest and forthright and hope you can build a relationship so a legislator is willing to listen to you," Smith said.
Lobbyists don't have any more special access to legislators than the average person has, according to Smith.
"I make it a point to be out and about in the community, for the very purpose of meeting folks, she said.
"If they have a concern or an issue, they're going to call me or ask me a question," Smith said. "They've met me, they know me."
"I go everywhere I can to try and get a sense and a feel of this district," Smith said.
"And as chair of Natural Resources, I also make it a point to get around the state, to hear from different river basin spokespersons" and the like. "I use state agencies, the Carl Vinson Institute of Government, all different kinds of resources." And "keep in mind, your legislators are citizen legislators," she said. They are "people who live around the people they represent and not in a bubble."
And her fellow legislators are usually the best sources of information.
No matter what lobbyists are doing, it isn't secret. It's not supposed to be, anyway.
Lobbyists are required to report their expenditures.
You can see these reports by visiting the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission website at www.ethics.georgia.gov.
Lobbyist reports, as well as campaign finance reports, are available on the website.
To see lobbyist reports, go to the bottom of the home page and click on "search reports."
You can then choose the type of report you want. If you choose lobbyist reports, the easiest way to search is by expenditure, which allows you to search contributions to a particular legislator or committee, from a particular lobbyist or organization, or gifts over a certain amount.
Smith thinks the transparency created by the reporting requirements, which were strengthened in 2010, is the best way to keep everything legitimate.
Smith said when she was originally elected in the 1990s, information about lobbyist expenditures wasn't readily available to the public. When the Republicans gained the majority in 2005, the Republicans passed disclosure legislation. The updates in 2010 required lobbyists to report expenditures more frequently during the session "so people can see what is going on."
According to the disclosure report for lobbyist gifts to the Natural Resources and Environment Committee, the other dinner sponsors were: The Georgia Poultry Federal, the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, the Georgia Mining Association, Georgia EMC, the Georgia Agribusiness Council, and the Georgia Chemistry Council, as well as Steve Allen and Allen Richardson, who work for lobbying firms.
Each of those sponsors paid $123.84, which was listed as covering "1.34 of the legislators attending."
The Georgia Conservancy and the Georgia Farm Bureau Federation each paid $222.92.
Smith is not in favor of a set cap on lobbyist payments, such as the $100 cap that is currently being discussed.
That's because she fears such a move will lead to less transparency.
"The states that have done that tend to have less transparency and openness... there are ways around things like that."
The experience of Tennessee is a prime example.
After a bribery scandal in 2005, the Tennessee legislature passed strict lobbyist limits in 2006.
In 2010, Tennessee was "ranked as overall the most corrupt state in the country," Smith said.
Either way, "I think these debates are very healthy," she said. "It is extremely important that we continue to look at ways the openness and transparency is readily available to the people we represent."
The most important question is, "As a citizen, can I find out what is going on in the life of the legislature? I think the answer should be yes," Smith said.
"Can we improve? I think there is always room for improvement."
"I hope the folks who know me, who see me, who try and reach me, know that I am readily available," Smith said.
When it comes to interacting with lobbyists, "[the public] needs to know what is happening, to see what your representative is doing, but at the same time -- you have to hope that the people you elect have a core sense of values and strength," Smith said. "And it has taken more strength to be a legislator than I ever thought I would need."
To reach Smith, call her office at 404-656-7149 or email lynn.smith@house.ga.gov.
Times-Herald.com does not necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Responsibility of comments rests solely with the writer. Comments posted in ALL CAPS will be deleted.
Submission of a comment does not guarantee publication. Comments will be posted by a moderator after being scanned for abusive language, relevance, etc. See our Comments FAQ for more details.
Is Rep Smith planning on a career as a stand up comedian? If so, she needs to practice her routine. She should be on the stage--in fact, I think there is one leaving in 15 minutes.
Posted by coweta cur-mudgeon at 2:22 AM
Rep Smith has worked so hard for Coweta County: in this case with the lobbyist-sponsored dinner, please do the right thing and let the voters know that you are not accepting lobbyist dollars.
Please step forward with a plan, letting us know what you'll do with the excess money.
Posted by Coweta voter at 7:50 AM
Your mantra remains unchanged...its a whacked up system and its too big to change so just deal with it. It is NOT just "a fact of life." It is the general complacency with it, like yours, that continues to erode our input and allows it to spiral to what we have...and will continue to worsen. I Hire my lawyer to represent me just like I Hire my congress person to represent me. If I have a cause important to me, I SHOULD have face time with MY reps who represent ME. If its important to many in my community, we sign a petition so that OUR rep can hear from us collectively. It's their JOB to "pay attention to us" because WE vote them in. You confirm my point precisely...its all about money and power and nothing about "representing" a constituency. As icing on the cake, our current economy has left me with PLENTY free time for now.
Posted by Yeah Right at 12:05 PM
Several years ago the per diem (literal translation per day or part of) fee for legislators was less than half what it is now. Then they voted to raise it for themselves. The 173 they get now is to cover "living expenses" when they come into session or meet on State business, even if they meet for either for an hour or less. Per Day or any part of, whether meeting in Atlanta or planning a lobbyist funded junket to the beach to play golf and oh, meeting with some committee or sub-committee co-horts. Cha Ching. Ring up 173 to go please. And it makes no difference if you are a legislator from Kings Bay (St. Mary's area of SE GA (almost FL) or short drive to the capitol. Cha Ching. Cha Ching. Look at archives of AJC and others and see who gathered in the Cha Ching. Some as high as mid 40s. Not bad per diem for folks who are part-timers and often don't have to spend it (oh and did I mention they get free parking at Capitol while you and I have to pay?). Cha Ching....... Now a question to Ms. Smith - did you charge the State 173 for the day you attended the lobbyist "sponsored" dinner?
Posted by Ed Murray at 5:35 PM
Dear Ed: You make an excellent point about the $173. per diem pay
Would the $173. be paid to Ms. Smith for that day? (If yes, that's wrong).
We have been at the Capitol building while in session - there is usually a lobbyist-catered lunch and a clobbyist-catered dinner most days of the week:
if all the lawmakers are getting $173 a day and all the lobbyists are feeding all the lawmakers, then the citizens are really paying 'through the nose...'
Posted by Coweta voter at 11:07 AM
Why no link to the original AJC story? Why reference it if a link isn't provided? I'd like to see the unfiltered allegations without having to hunt up the article. It's standard practice these days to provide the link.
Posted by Jeff Bishop at 3:22 AM
Yeah Right, you wouldn't go to court without a lawyer, and you will never be represented sufficiently by just your rep. Your rep may not have the influence needed, or may not be on the right committees, or just may be against your idea. What are you going to do to get heard? Here's a totally hypothetical example: Let's say you are in favor of some new law or abolishing an existing law. If you want the legislators to actually do something about your cause, then you have to convince them to first pay atttention to your cause, then take action. How are you gonna accomplish that, by hanging around the capital hoping to get noticed? What if you have a job and can't just hang around the capital? Then you need someone to take up your cause with the legislators. And that's where the lobbyists come in. You, me, nor anyone else has any chance of making any impact without either a lot of free time or through a lobbyist.
Posted by Why all the fuss? at 8:54 PM
Ms. Smith:
Your responses are a great version of Waffle House scattered, covered and smothered. Did you collect the $173 a day per diem for the day you went to that meeting? Isn't per diem money alloted to you (you all doubled it a few years ago and vote it to yourself) to buy your food, which in the real world the rest of us would have to pack a lunch or eat when we got home, maybe even eat cold leftovers? Lobbyists peddlers of influence and they influence by buying dinners, paying for trips, gifts sent to the office, tickets to high dollar events and of course the ever prospering campaign donations even when you don't have an opposed election. Please be real with us in the future and don't treat us like we don't have a clue about politics.
Posted by Ed Murray at 7:49 PM
Aren't our Legislators supposed to be "lobbying" for the constituents of their districts? So, Fuss, what you are saying is that it is now acceptable practice to "hire" representation in our legislature by voting for them, then turn around and "hire" lobbyists to get things done by our legislature...?? No wonder we're all broke.
Posted by Yeah Right at 6:52 PM
...until I needed to get something done in the capital. The long and short of it is that nothing positive or negative will happen without a lobbyist. Just like nothing will happen in court without a lawyer. That's just the way it works. Deal with it.
Posted by Why all the fuss? at 3:11 PM
....there wouldn't be a need for lobbyists. Also, our elected representatives would vote to reduce their salaries and remove themselves from office or committees if a conflict of interest arises. But remember the Golden Rule: He who has the gold rules.
Posted by Newnan Born at 2:28 PM
Rep. Smith is now a career politician and does not seem to understand her constituents. In the business world, such meetings are held without a dinner, over soft drinks and light snacks, more suited for conversation. Rep. Smith is on the defensive now that Atlanta newspaper has exposed her. In some states "Public Office for Personal Gain" is normal.
Posted by NM at 2:20 PM
Ever since Korea one of my uncles drew a disability check for being crazy. He always claimed to be sane. But he still got a check every month 'til he died.
Posted by Joe at 1:28 PM
If you believe that lobbyists do not strong arm the local reps, you have been with your head in the sand way to long. The bank roll their reelections and get what they lobby for. All local legs are in this for themeleves and no one else. It is time to get people in their that care about their district and not about themselves.
Posted by Paul at 12:51 PM
Surely you wrote that in jest. Just so you will know, lobbyists don't do anything to help the average citizen. Period. Lobbyists look out for the folks who hire them and those who hire them are not the average citizen. Lobbyists should be against the law but that ain't never gonna happen. Just ask Rep Lynn Smith.
Posted by Billy Bob at 12:37 PM
Lobbyists are a necessary part of government whether we like it or not. I know its difficult to believe, but without them the average citizen would get a raw deal. Lobbyists are the people who get your point across to the legislator. Legislators know the lobbyists personally through dealing with them every day (and through events as above), so they are more inclined to listen to their views. They don't know you and me, so its more difficult. Think of a lobbyist as an itermediary. Also, a lobbyist is abosolutely required if you want to keep the legislation you are interested in moving through the process. Legislation simply isn't going to get passed without one. Lot's of negative stuff can happen fast. Lobbyists are there looking out for their clients. Anyone can retain a lobbyist. That is, anyone with at least $10,000. Or you can spend your own time hanging around the capital trying to get a piece of a legislator's time. Good luck! No, I am not now, or have ever been a lobbyist, and I don't consider any to be friends. But I've learned first hand how valuable they are to the legislative process.
Let the arrows fly...
Posted by Why all the fuss? at 12:01 PM
Who uses the term "street cred" to describe a person's level of influence ?
Lobbyists and politicians are slimy, and this should be illegal.
Posted by William at 11:37 AM
$173 a day per diem even if you meet to have dinner and talk, plus salary for being REP and you still need a sponsor to buy your dinner? They aren't influencing you? Yea Right! I'd come up with a better answer than that next time I get caught with the foxes in the chicken house.
Posted by Ed Murray at 10:24 AM
the one question not answered for asked , which of the groups helping sponsor the dinner were
contributors to Rep. Smith campaign for reelection. ?????
From past history lobbyist have influenced elected officials and limits should be in place.
Posted by Rick page at 9:59 AM
Incumbancy
2/10/2012
Link To This Comment
PLEASE remeber this when you go to vote. We keep voting the same people into office year after year. Recently a poll was released that said congressional approval had dipped to 10%. Vote the bums out of office!
Posted by Dave at 9:51 AM