The Georgia DOT says the Highway 34 Bypass widening project & its contractors will get a 6-month extension to complete the job. Will the GDOT complete the project in 6 months or will it need another extension?
Total Votes:
Published Sunday, February 07, 2010 in Local
By Jeff Bishop
The Newnan Times-Herald
Gov. Sonny Perdue's proposal to appoint -- rather than elect -- four statewide constitutional officers ran into opposition Friday from both sides of the aisle.
Associated Press reports that critics from both parties said the plan was unlikely to win the needed two-thirds vote in the Legislature and would consolidate too much power with the state's chief executive.
Coweta County area "Tea Party" activists strongly condemned Perdue's proposal.
"Tea Party Patriots of Georgia and Coweta have spoken out strongly against this," said Wendy Bloedt of the Coweta Tea Party Patriots.
She and the Tea Party sent out a press release saying that the proposal represents nothing less than "Perdue's attempt to take electing power away from the citizens of Georgia by removing the ability to elect four Constitutional offices, and amend the Constitution to grant that power to the Governor to appoint those positions."
Those offices would include Insurance Commissioner, Labor Commissioner, Agriculture Commissioner, and School Superintendent.
Julianne Thompson, state coordinator of Tea Party Patriots, said, "We are all for the idea of the governor and Legislature streamlining state government, but -- with all due respect -- giving the governor more power is not the way to do it.
"If Governor Perdue and the Legislature truly want reform and a more efficient government, then we call on them to pass zero-based budgeting," she said. "We call on them to eliminate state departments that are not necessary. We ask for sunset laws on all state agencies to prove they are performing efficiently, and we ask for ethics reform. These are issues we support and will stand with them on."
Denise Ognio, a local coordinator with the Coweta Tea Party Patriots, agreed.
"We didn't question issues for so long," she said. "Surely we've learned through all of this the importance of the people's will! Things don't necessarily begin as corrupt, but this idea of a Georgia governor making appointments to such crucial offices only invites corruption in the door! We don't know who the next governor will be. We don't know what the core values of the governor 10 years down the road will be! It most definitely does shift power -- away from the electorate!"
This was one issue on which representatives from both parties seemed to agree, for once.
"I have serious reservations about taking power away from the people like this," state Sen. Tim Golden, a Valdosta Democrat, said.
Perdue's plan would hand the governor the power to appoint the state schools superintendent, labor commissioner, agriculture commissioner and insurance commissioner. Those posts are currently elected. The change would take place in 2014, after Perdue leaves office.
It would require a constitutional amendment, which means that should it receive the needed supermajority in the state Legislature, it would then need to be approved by voters, according to the AP. The plan must also pass muster with the U.S. Department of Justice under the Voting Rights Act, according to the state Attorney General Thurbert Baker's office.
A spokesman for Baker said Perdue did not seek their counsel on the proposal.
Georgia's longtime state Agriculture Commissioner, Tommy Irvin, said Friday that the proposal was a "terrible idea."
"You would not have an independent agriculture commissioner, as I've been," said the Democrat, who was first elected in 1969.
"Let the people vote."
Republicans were among those who were skeptical, the AP reported.
House Majority Whip Ed Lindsey called it "very doubtful" that voters would give up their right to have a say.
"Traditionally the voters, once they have been given the right to vote on something, they are reluctant to take that right back from themselves," the Atlanta Republican said.
State Rep. Jill Chambers, an Atlanta Republican, called the chances of the Legislature giving more power to the governor "slim."
House Minority Leader DuBose Porter questioned Perdue's timing, saying lawmakers are already more than one-fourth of the way through their legislative session and Perdue has less than one year left in his final term.
"Why now?" asked Porter. "Possibly this is something that should be looked at but there are so many other things -- jobs, transportation -- that reorganizing state government in this way is not a high priority."
Still, the plan has supporters.
"It's like the president picking his cabinet. The governor should have the same privilege," state Sen. Jeff Mullis, a Chickamauga Republican, said. "It might help (the governor) to control the budget better."
Charles Brasch III, a Newnan native who is now in the Atlanta insurance industry, also said the governor's plan should be given a fair hearing.
"Maybe the governor can appoint qualified people instead of the ones that make the most campaign dollars and win the popularity contests," he said.
Here is a social issue. (after many tries). Stand on your own two feet!! Whining and complaining about how a bunch of REAL Americans talk about you is just silly... move to Iran... take Obama with you. The TEA Party ARE NOT republicans. An honest politician is only lying to you.
Posted by not a socialist at 9:42 PM
Turf killer I think banking regulation is one heck of a good argument against appointments. I think the TEA party is right on this one.. though they have turned me off in the last year with their commentary on almost all social issues. I do think the Tea party is doing a good job of keeping the republicans honest, I just hope that the TEA party isn't absorbed into the GOP and comes out strongly for libertarian candidates.
Posted by somewhere in the middle at 10:18 PM
The Republicans didn't take anything away the democrats did it to themselves. The democrats should have gotten out and voted for there candidate.
Posted by Bubba B Bad at 9:58 AM
Turfkiller - are you saying we can vote on Governor and Legislators who can then get it right for us better than we as voters can get it? Going back to your example of the Dept of Banking an Finance - have you heard any "reform" out of the Governor or Legislature with GA having the most bank failures in the country? Not!!!!
Posted by eugene at 9:16 AM
Liberty first. In an era where government is trying its best to intrude upon every part of our lives, I'll err on the side of KEEPING my vote, thanks. Allowing one elected official (of any political persuasion) carte blanche is a situation rife for cronyism and corruption, where positions go to politcal friends and contributors instead of who the PEOPLE want. SHAME on Republicans who think taking a vote from the people is the way to go. Their out-of-touch outlook is just one of many reasons why people choose the TEA Party over them or the Dems for that matter. Turfkiller, I'm SURE you've never attended the first TEA Party meeting. Your ignorance about the movement is obvious. And your notion that 'government' and 'efficient' belong in the same sentence is, well, hilarious!
Posted by Not a fan of government at 1:50 AM
Again you are out in left field you are completly clueless as always about the tea party. There are other news networks besides MSNBC.
Posted by Bubba B Bad at 12:07 AM
Perdue has caused me to leave the Republican party.
Posted by joe at 11:23 PM
Eugene, your rule that the exceptions can only prove your point and only disprove mine is more nonsense.
Criticism of the tea party is that they are not picking up on the issues but only playing politics spouting a generalized fear of government.
You can legislate and reform the relationship of the governor, departments and whom he can appoint. You cannot regulate who wins an election. Who knows some tea party patriot who makes up child like rules could win the election.
Posted by turfkiller at 10:03 PM
...that ignorance about the Tea Party phenomenon would be accompanied by ignorance about the structure of state government.
Posted by exasperated at 9:10 PM
Just to be clear in no way was I saying Commissioner Irvin or any of the others are not qualified; just that with enough money and a nice smile I could have a shot at being in charge of agriculture which I know nothing about!!
Posted by Charles Brasch III at 5:40 PM
On the federal level we elect the president, he selects his cabinet to advise him. In theory the president selects the best people for the job to help him make the right decisions. It's the way our founding fathers thought it should work and I stand by that so why not do the same here? Now I know the argument will be but look how bad that level is and I certainly agree. But that's not the systems fault, that's ours
Posted by Charles Brasch III at 5:07 PM
Turfkiller, your comment about GA having highest bank failures and Tea Party's fear of giving more power to the Governor to apppoint, you might want to check to see that the banks are regulated in GA by the Department of Banking and Finance, under the supervision of the Commissioner, who is appointed by the Governor. So, maybe that might be a good reason not to give the Governor more power....
Posted by eugene at 2:57 PM
I've lived in a state where the only statewide elected officers are governor and lt.-governor (on the same ticket, so the LG really doesn't count), and there is no advantage whatsoever to having the governor appoint all the other statewide officials.
Leave it alone, Sonny.
Posted by exasperated at 1:47 PM
It’s possible in making these four positions appointments, State Government could operate more effectively and efficiently if structured appropriately. But the Tea Party shouts FEAR of government and spouts nonsense.
Zero based budgeting is what should be feared and is not in any manner a process that should or could be afforded by any of the 50 state governments. It would actually make government bigger and less efficient.
What is missing from the Tea Party points is any mention of the benefits of these offices being elected as to appointed. If you were to believe the Tea Party, you just couldn’t regulate insurance any better. Unemployment is proof of that labor is doing just dandy. Did the Tea Party forget the great job the agriculture department did with preventing the contamination of peanuts? Let’s not forget the phenomenal success of our schools here in Georgia. While the Tea Party is proud of being always near the bottom in education, we are FIRST in bank failures! So how come that State department is missing from the “needs reform” list? But hey they are too busy shouting FEAR and spouting nonsense.
Posted by turfkiller at 1:34 PM
Mr. Brasch says that the voters can't get it right because they vote on popularity in a race involving lot of campaign money. HMMMM Governor is elected through the biggest popularity contest and most money spent of any State wide race. Governor has too much power as is.
Posted by Smith Jones at 10:41 AM
not a socialist
2/11/2010
Link To This Comment
So why did the tea party allow Sarah Palin to speak?
Posted by Joe Cool at 9:49 AM